• Users Online: 165
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 14-22

The effect of displaced canine on the dentoskeletal and soft tissue development of the face: A cephalometric study


Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Suruchi Singh
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore Ujjain State Highway, Near MR 10 Crossing, Indore, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijor.ijor_32_17

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: To analyze the skeletal features of patients with maxillary canine impaction. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 30 patients in buccally displaced canine group (BDCG), 15 in palatally displaced canine group (PDCG), 30 in impacted canine group (ICG), and 50 in control reference sample (control group [CG]) were used to analyze the selected dentoskeletal characteristics. One-way analysis of variance was used to identify the differences in angles among the four groups (BDCG, PDCG, ICG, and CG). The differences in the relative distribution among the groups were tested by Pearson's Chi-square test. Independent samples t-test was used to test the significance of differences between the two groups. Results: In BDCG, retrognathic maxilla, tip up maxilla, retrognathic mandible, skeletal Class II, and horizontal growth pattern were the significant factors. In PDCG, skeletal Class II and hypodivergent were significant factors. In ICG, retrognathic maxilla, retrognathic mandible, hypodivergent relationships are poorly significant factors. The nasolabial angle and Steiner's S line were insignificant in all groups except the ICG where acute nasolabial angle is poorly significant. Conclusion: When compared to controls, canine impaction(s) revealed a trend toward retrognathic maxilla, retrognathic mandible, skeletal Class II, and hypodivergent skeletal relationship.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed408    
    Printed49    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded80    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal