|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 72-77
Gemstone of human personality: The smile
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India
|Date of Web Publication||30-May-2018|
Dr. Sukhpal Kaur
Chandigarh Sirhind Road, Fatehgarh Sahib - 140 406, Punjab
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
The science of smiling was initiated by Charles Darwin. He noticed that the causes, consequences, and manifestations of smiling are universal, whereas many other nonverbal body language behaviors such as gesture or touch differ between cultures and are therefore probably learnt. People express their emotions through smile and also it plays an important role in facial beauty. In this article, we will discuss various patterns of smile and factors influencing esthetics of smile.
Keywords: Buccal corridor, gingival display, posed smile, smile arc
|How to cite this article:|
Kaur S. Gemstone of human personality: The smile. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2018;9:72-7
| Introduction|| |
The value of a beautiful smile is undeniable  as this is the first thing that is noticed about anybody. Recently, the topic of smile esthetics has become important for orthodontists because more orthodontic patients evaluate the outcome of treatment by their smile and the overall enhancement in their facial appearance.
Studying smile esthetics is difficult because of the inability to standardize a realistic model and alter the variables of interest. Hence, orthodontist should treat toward an ideal; however, the expectations of the patient must be considered because ideals of esthetics may vary. Wylie  astutely wrote that the layman's opinion of the human profile is every bit good as orthodontists and perhaps even better since it is not conditioned by orthodontic propaganda. Due to these differences, the orthodontist may have some uncertainty in evaluating the profile of the patient and deciding the treatment plan that will satisfy the patient. Hence, in providing the highest standard of care for the patient, careful communication with the patient concerning esthetic expectations is essential and to design beautiful smile by orthodontic treatment, it is also essential to know principles that manage the balance between teeth and soft tissues during smile.
Neuromuscular smile patterns
Plastic surgeons identified the following neuromuscular patterns of smile [Figure 1].,
It is seen in 31% of the population. In this smile pattern, levator labii superioris are dominating, they contract first exposing the cuspid teeth, then corners of mouth contract to pull the lips upward and outward.
It is found in 2% of population. The lips are typically visualized as two parallel chevrons. The levators of the upper lip, the levators of the corners of the mouth, and the depressors of the lower lip contract simultaneously, showing all the upper and lower teeth concurrently. This smile is characterized by the strong muscular pull and retraction of the lower lip downward and back.
It is the most common type of smile, seen in 67% of population. In this smile, the corners of the mouth are first pulled up and outward, followed by contraction of levators of the upper lip to show the upper teeth and gingival scaffold.
| Classification of Smile by Ackerman and Ackerman|| |
Posed or social smile
It is voluntary and need not be elicited by emotion. This is unstrained, static expression and can be sustained. The lip animation is fairly reproducible, similar to the smile that may be rehearsed for photographs [Figure 2].
Unposed or enjoyment smile
It is natural, expressing authentic human emotions. It is elicited by laughter or great pleasure and is involuntary. It is dynamic in the sense that it bursts forth but not sustained [Figure 2].
| Classification of Smile by Tjan|| |
In this smile pattern, the total cervicoincisal length of the maxillary anterior teeth and a continuous band of gingiva are visible [Figure 3].
This type of smile reveals 75%–100% of crowns of the maxillary anterior teeth and the interproximal gingiva [Figure 4].
This smile displays <75% of crowns of anterior teeth [Figure 5].
| Parameters Influencing Esthetics of Smile|| |
Smile arc is the relationship between the curvature of the incisal edges of the maxillary anterior teeth and the curvature of upper border of the lower lip. When curvature of incisal edges of maxillary anterior teeth is parallel to the curvature of lower lip, it is called as consonant smile arc [Figure 6], and if these are not parallel to each other, smile arc is nonconsonant [Figure 7]. Hulsey  confirmed the hypothesis of Frush and Fisher that smiles with flatter smile arc (nonconsonant) are less attractive. Parekh et al. also reported that both laypeople and orthodontists prefer smiles with parallel smile arcs.
Buccal corridor space
The buccal corridor is the space created between the buccal surface of the posterior teeth and the lip corners when the patient smiles  [Figure 8]. It is measured from the mesial line angle of maxillary first premolar to the inferior portion of commissures of lips. Ioi, et al. found that both orthodontists and dental students prefer broader smiles with minimal buccal corridor space. Tikku et al. and Parekh et al. also found that excessive buccal corridor spaces are less attractive to both orthodontists and laypersons. However, some studies reported that there is no influence of buccal corridor space on smile esthetics.,,
Gingival display also influences esthetics of smile. Geron and Atalia  concluded that esthetic range for upper gingival exposure on smiling and speech was up to 1 mm and esthetic range for lower incisor exposure was with no gingival exposure. Attractiveness decreased with increased gingival display of upper and lower teeth during smile and speech. Hulsey and Mackley ,, demonstrated that minimal gingival display is more esthetic. Gingival display of 0,1 and 2 mm has the highest score for attractiveness, and different educational backgrounds of evaluators did not influence their perception., Hence, gingival display should be considered along with other parameters in determining the treatment.
Midline discrepancy and midline diastema
Ideally, the dental midline should be in alignment with the facial midline but usually it does not [Figure 9]. Janson et al. recommended that discrepancy up to 2.2 mm is acceptable. According to Kokich et al. discrepancies, up to 4 mm may remain undetected. Slight midline discrepancy can be corrected by restorative dentistry but for large discrepancy, ideal treatment is orthodontic treatment. Large midline diastema [Figure 10] also has negative impact on smile esthetics., In Indian population, acceptable threshold for diastema is up to 1.5 mm and in Africans, diastema up to 2–3 mm is esthetically acceptable., Soft-tissue attachment preventing the closure of midline diastema should be checked before treatment.
Length and width of teeth
According to Edward Larren, the length of central incisor in the esthetic zone should to be between 10.5 and 12 mm. It is recommended that lateral incisors be shorter than central incisors by 1–2.5 mm and canines be shorter than central incisors by 0.5–1 mm. The height/width proportions of individual teeth and the tooth width in relation to each other are also important for smile esthetics. Most studies specify that the central incisors have about 8:10 width/height ratio. For the best esthetics, the apparent width of the lateral incisor should be 62% of the width of the central incisor, the apparent width of the canine should be 62% of the lateral incisor, and the apparent width of the first premolar should be 62% of canine from the frontal examination. This ratio of recurring 62% proportions is referred as the “Golden proportions” [Figure 11].
Tooth shade and color
Tooth color is also important for facial appearance, so there is increasing consumption of both professionally and consumer-applied tooth-whitening products. Approximately, a third of adults in the USA are unhappy with the tooth color. Progressive change in shade of teeth from the midline to posterior is important for an attractive and natural appearing smile. The maxillary central incisors tend to be the brightest in the smile, the lateral incisors less, the canines are the least bright, and first and second premolars are more closely matched to the lateral incisors. They are lighter and brighter than the canines.
Contacts, connectors, and embrasures
Contacts are areas where two adjacent teeth exactly touch and connector is broad area where adjacent teeth appear to touch. There is an esthetic relationship exists between the interproximal connectors of anterior teeth and length of central incisors that is 50-40-30 rule. This rule states that the ideal connector zone between maxillary central incisors should be 50% of the length of central incisor and between maxillary central and lateral incisor it should be 40% of the length of the central incisor, and between maxillary canine and lateral incisor it should be 30% of the length of the central incisor  [Figure 12]. The incisal embrasures are triangular spaces incisal to contact points. Ideally, there should be natural display of embrasures with progressive increase in size from the central incisor to canine. The individuality of the incisors will be lost if incisal embrasures are not placed properly. Too deep incisal embrasures will tend to make the teeth to look unnaturally pointed. As a rule, distoincisal corner of tooth is more rounded than its mesioincisal corner.
|Figure 12: Progressively decreasing size of connectors and increasing size of embrasure from centrals to posterior teeth|
Click here to view
| Smile Symmetry|| |
Smile can be asymmetric due to transverse cant of the maxillary occlusal plane or asymmetric smile curtain [Figure 13] and [Figure 14]. Transverse cant of occlusal plane can be due to different amounts of tooth eruption on the right and left sides or skeletal mandibular asymmetry, resulting in compensatory cant of maxilla. In an asymmetric smile curtain, there is difference in the relative positioning of the corners of the mouth in the vertical plane. This asymmetry of smile curtain can be assessed by the parallelism of the commissural and pupillary lines. Different elevation of the upper lip in an asymmetric smile may be due to deficiency of muscular tone on one side of the face. Myofunctional exercises have been advised in such cases to overcome this deficiency and restore smile symmetry., It is poorly assessed in static photographic images and is best seen in digital video clips.
| Gingival Heights, Shape, and Contour|| |
Proportional gingival heights make the dental appearance normal and attractive. Gingival height of central incisor is highest, gingival height of lateral incisor is 1.5 mm lower, and canine gingival margin is at the level of central incisor gingival margin. Gingival shape is curvature of gingiva at the margin of tooth. The gingival shape of maxillary central incisor and canine should be elliptical and gingival shape of maxillary lateral incisor should be symmetrical half oval or half circle. Gingival zenith is most apical point of gingival tissue. It should be located distal to the longitudinal axis of maxillary centrals and canines and gingival zenith of maxillary lateral incisors should coincide with longitudinal axis  [Figure 15].
| Conclusion|| |
In our modern competitive society, a pleasing appearance often means the difference between success and failure in both our professional and personal lives. Therefore, the current trends in orthodontics place greater emphasis on smile esthetics. Hence, orthodontists should make every effort to develop a harmonious balance that will produce the most attractive smile possible for each patient being treated. Furthermore, it is of great importance to understand and appreciate the perception of what is esthetic among a population to provide dental care successfully. The above discussion suggests that various elements of smile directly affect esthetics of smile. Therefore, smile analysis must be an integral part of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Maulik C, Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:307-15.
Işiksal E, Hazar S, Akyalçin S. Smile esthetics: Perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:8-16.
Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006;76:557-63.
Hall D, Taylor RW, Jacobson A, Sadowsky PL, Bartolucci A. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:514-25.
Wylie WL. The mandibular incisor – Its role in facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1955;25:32-41.
Rubin LR. The anatomy of a smile: Its importance in the treatment of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;53:384-7.
Paletz JL, Manktelow RT, Chaban R. The shape of a normal smile: Implications for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:784-9.
Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:2-11.
Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:24-8.
Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993;63:183-9.
Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57:132-44.
Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 4th
ed. USA, St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2005. p. 43.
Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod 2009;79:628-33.
Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya RP, Ahmad N. Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:187-94. [Full text]
Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 2006;76:198-203.
Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:343-50.
McNamara L, McNamara JA Jr., Ackerman MB, Baccetti T. Hard- and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:491-9.
Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod 2005;75:778-84.
Akyalcin S, Frels LK, English JD, Laman S. Analysis of smile esthetics in American board of orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2014;84:486-91.
Zawawi KH, Malki GA, Al-Zahrani MS, Alkhiary YM. Effect of lip position and gingival display on smile and esthetics as perceived by college students with different educational backgrounds. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2013;5:77-80.
Suzuki L, Machado AW, Bitttercourt MA. An evaluation of the influence of gingival display level in the smile esthetics. Dent Press J Orthod 2011;16:37e1-10.
Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TM, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JR, et al.
Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2011;81:153-61.
Kokich VO Jr., Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311-24.
Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: Asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:141-51.
Rodrigues Cde D, Magnani R, Machado MS, Oliveira OB. The perception of smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod 2009;79:634-9.
Akinboboye B, Umesi D, Ajayi Y. Transcultural perception of maxillary midline diastema. Int J Esthet Dent 2015;10:610-7.
Kumar S, Gandhi S, Valiathan A. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:295. [Full text]
Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment. Dent Update 2008;35:159-62, 164-6, 169-70.
McLaren EA, Cao PT. Smile analysis and esthetic design: In the zone. Inside Dent 2009;5:44-8.
Joiner A. Tooth colour: A review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32 Suppl 1:3-12.
Odioso LL, Gibb RD, Gerlach RW. Impact of demographic, behavioral, and dental care utilization parameters on tooth color and personal satisfaction. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 2000;21:S35-41.
Morley J. A multidisciplinary approach to complex aesthetic restoration with diagnostic planning. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:575-7.
Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:39-45.
Singla S, Lehl G. Smile analysis in orthodontics. Indian J Oral Sci 2014;5:49-54. [Full text]
Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:225-32.
] [Full text]
Gibson RM. Smiling and facial exercise. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:139-44.
Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:221-36.
Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th
ed. United States: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 190.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15]