|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 107-112
Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A way to treat transverse maxillary deficiency
Rohit Kumar Maheshwari, Harsh Harani, Savan Joshi, Amit Tiwari
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||31-Aug-2018|
Rohit Kumar Maheshwari
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore Ujjain State Highway, Near Mr 10 Crossing, Indore, Madhya Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Transverse maxillomandibular discrepancies are a major component of several malocclusions. Transverse maxillary discrepancies are routinely corrected in growing patients with appliances that separate the median palatal and associated maxillary sutures. This type of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) is not feasible in adults, however, because of the increasing resistance of the sutures. Surgically assisted RPE is an alternative method that reduces the resistance of the closed midpalatal suture to correct maxillary constriction in an adult. It allows clinicians to achieve effective maxillary expansion in a skeletally mature patient.
Keywords: Midpalatal suture, surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion, transverse maxillary discrepancies
|How to cite this article:|
Maheshwari RK, Harani H, Joshi S, Tiwari A. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A way to treat transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2018;9:107-12
|How to cite this URL:|
Maheshwari RK, Harani H, Joshi S, Tiwari A. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A way to treat transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Orthod Rehabil [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 24];9:107-12. Available from: https://www.orthodrehab.org/text.asp?2018/9/3/107/240308
| Introduction|| |
Nonsurgical rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was used by Angle as early as 1860 and continues to be used by orthodontists with a high rate of success for growing children. Although RPE has been relatively successful in children and adolescents, it has been fraught with failures in adults.,,, In adults, orthodontic RPE may result in alveolar bending, periodontal membrane compression, lateral tooth displacement, tooth extrusion, and transverse relapse, which can subsequently lead to failure of the procedure., Historically, the midpalatal suture was thought to be the area of resistance to expansion, but Lines and Bell and Jacobs demonstrated that the area of increased facial skeletal resistance to expansion was not the midpalatal suture but the zygomaticotemporal, zygomaticofrontal, and zygomaticomaxillary sutures. This stimulated the development of various maxillary osteotomies to expand the maxilla laterally in conjunction with orthodontic RPE appliances.,,,,,
Indications for surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion
The following have been reported in the literature as indications for surgically assisted RPE (SARPE), all applying to a skeletally mature patient with a constricted maxillary arch.,
- To increase the maxillary arch perimeter, to correct posterior crossbite, and when no additional surgical jaw movements are planned,
- To widen the maxillary arch as a preliminary procedure, even if further orthognathic surgery is planned. This is to avoid increased risks, inaccuracy, and instability associated with segmental maxillary osteotomy,
- To provide space for a crowded maxillary dentition when extractions are not indicated,
- To widen maxillary hypoplasia associated with clefts of the palate,
- To reduce wide black buccal corridors when smiling,
- To overcome the resistance of the sutures when OpenManage Essential (OME) has failed.
| Etiology of Transverse Maxillary Discrepancy|| |
Transverse maxillary deficiency are most commonly associated with
- Habits – thumb-sucking,
- Obstructive sleep apnea,
- Iatrogenic (cleft repair),
- Palatal dimensions and inheritance,
- Klippel–Feil syndrome
- Cleft lip and palate
- Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis
- Marfan syndrome.
Craniosynostosis (Apert, Crouzon, and Carpenter disease),Nonsyndromic palatal synostosis,Multifactorial.
| Patient Selection|| |
The first step in the case selection process is determination of transverse maxillary discrepancy (TMD). Clinical evaluation includes:
- Assessment of the maxillary arch form and symmetry
- The shape of the palatal vault
- The width of the buccal corridors on smiling
- The predominant mode of breathing (nasal or oral)
- Excessively wide buccal corridors, paranasal hollowing or narrow alar bases usually suggest magnetic thickness detector (MTD).
Unilateral or bilateral crossbite, severe crowding, a V-shaped or an hourglass-shaped occlusion, and a high palatal vault are additional visual parameters that can help the clinician make the first determination of TMD in a patient. Study models should be used to thoroughly assess the arch form and the shape and make specific measurements to evaluate for MTD. Several indexes have been proposed by various authors to measure lateral discrepancies. The most common include the indexes of Pont, Linder Harth, and Korkhaus.
2. Age as criterion
- Epker and Wolford recommended surgical assistance for maxillary expansion in patients over 16 years of age,,,,
- Timms and Vero used 25 years as the upper limit for recommending OME,
- Mossaz et al. arbitrarily recommended “after the second decade of life” for the surgical assistance of maxillary expansion,,,,,,
- Alpern and Yurosko suggested that sex should also be considered as a selection criterion. According to them, men over the age of 25 and women over 20 require surgical assistance for expansion.
3. Medical history
In treatment planning and case selection for MTD, the patient's medical condition must be thoroughly evaluated. These include hyperthyroidism, hypophosphatemic, Vitamin D-resistant rickets, mucopolysaccharidoses, and mucolipidoses.,
4. Periodontal status
Müller et al. pointed out that it is essential to record the thickness of the gingival tissues during clinical evaluation of the periodontium. Orthodontic tooth movement can have a detrimental influence on the mucogingival complex, especially when the keratinized tissue and underlying bone appear to be thin. Therefore, evaluations of the gingival tissues and the biotype are essential to determine the ability of the tissues to withstand the pressure of OME; otherwise, surgical release of the sutures is needed to remove interferences to maxillary expansion.,,
Orthodontic considerations and preparation
Before sending a patient for a SARPE, the orthodontist must ensure that there is enough space between the roots of the central incisors for a midline split. A periapical or occlusal radiograph should be taken, and the interradicular bone evaluated [Figure 1]. If space is inadequate, preoperative root divergence must be created to ensure the postoperative and posttreatment health of the teeth; the patient should be seen regularly by a periodontist [Figure 2].
- Bell described surgical technique:
- A rigid fixed tooth-borne appliance capable of producing orthopedic forces, which is usually cemented to the maxillary first molars and first premolars before surgery,
- The operation may be performed with the patient under general anesthesia or local anesthesia,
- A paramedian incision is made under local anesthesia [Figure 3],
- After the mucoperiosteum is released, the midpalatal suture is separated with a midline cut, about 3-mm deep but not reaching the foramen incisivum. The mucosal and bony cuts should not overlap [Figure 4],
- Two bony cuts, each about 4-mm long, are then made on each side of the lateral maxillary buttress above the root apices and parallel to the occlusal plane [Figure 5],
- After the osteotomy, the maxillary segments are not fully detached but can be separated by rapid expansion with a jackscrew appliance [Figure 6],
- The expansion appliance should be cemented in place just after surgery and activated three or four quarter – turns by the surgeon after the bony cuts are made,
- The rest of the expansion is achieved in daily increments for about 2 weeks after surgery. Overcorrection of about 2.5 mm per side (5 mm total) is usually advisable,
- Surgically assisted palatal expansion affects only the transverse plane of space,
- Patients with anteroposterior or vertical skeletal problems often undergo a two- or three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy. However, we believe that surgically assisted expansion followed by a one-piece Le Fort procedure has less risk of complication and produces more stable expansionm,
- Surgically assisted expansion can also be used in cases of unilateral or asymmetrical narrowing of the maxilla. The osteotomies are made on only one side, creating a differential anchorage situation, and the expansion appliance then produces more lateral translation on that side,
- Orthodontic retention should be similar to that of a nonsurgical case: the expansion appliance should remain in place for at least 3 months,
- When further orthodontic correction is required, the expansion appliance can be replaced after 3 months with a palatal arch between the first molars, and orthodontic treatment can proceed as usual [Figure 7],
- The overcorrection should be maintained throughout active treatment,
- A slight relapse of 2–3 mm is common, but this is accommodated by the overcorrection.
Postexpansion evaluation and treatment
A periapical or occlusal radiograph is taken, and the symmetry of the bone should be evaluated. The circumference of the central incisors is gently probed, and the pocket depths compared to presurgical values. Four outcomes are possible:
- Symmetric bone on the mesial surfaces of both central incisors and the gingival attachment is intact, i.e. the interdental bone was fractured through the palatal suture and equal bone exists on the mesial surfaces of both central incisors; activate the appliance one turn every day and evaluate weekly [Figure 8].
- Symmetric bone on the mesial surfaces of both central incisors but the gingival attachment is poor. Do not activate appliance until the gingiva is healthy. Activate appliance one turn every other day and evaluate weekly.
- Asymmetric bony separation with healthy gingival attachment. Activate appliance one turn every other day and evaluate every 48–72 h.
- Asymmetric bony separation with poor gingival attachment [Figure 9]. Do not activate appliance until the gingiva is healthy. Activate appliance one turn every other day and evaluate every 48–72 h.
Other uses of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion
- A morphologically narrow palate has been associated with mouth breathing and altered neuromuscular patterns
- The consequences of ventilatory dysfunction are complex and thought to be related to sleeping disorders, including sleep apnea and nocturnal enuresis
- It can be hypothesized that similar associations between MTD in adults and some effects of ventilatory dysfunction exist in which SARPE might be useful
- The recovery of transverse growth discrepancy by surgical and mechanical enlargement produces substantial enlargement of the maxillary apical base and the palatal vault.
Retention, stability, and relapse
In general, most reports state that surgical expansion is more stable than OME. Some authors recommended that retention is not necessary for SARPE, and the orthodontist can begin orthodontic treatment without a holding phase. Other authors recommended a period of retention after expansion varying from 2 to 12 months. The relapse rates for SARPE vary from 5% to about 25%. These rates are significantly lower than the relapse rate of OME, which can be as high as 63%, 68%, and 95%. The high rate of relapse associated with OME is due to its use in skeletally advanced patients. OME is neither predictable nor stable in older patients.,,
Risks, limitations, and complications
SARPE procedures have conventionally been reported to have low morbidity, especially when compared with other orthognathic surgical procedures. Palatal tissue irritation is a frequent complication of SARPE. This can be either due to impingement from the appliance or associated with a rapid rate of expansion.,
Other complications include hemorrhage, gingival recession, root resorption, injury to the branches of the maxillary nerve infection, pain, devitalization of the teeth and altered pulpal blood flow, periodontal breakdown, sinus infection, extrusion of teeth attached to the appliance, relapse, and unilateral expansion.,
| Conclusion|| |
SARPE is a widely used procedure for the correction of MTD in skeletally mature patients. Like any other surgical procedure, SARPE is not free of risks, and careful planning and execution of treatment are necessary to ensure an acceptable outcome. However, there is sparse information on many issues pertaining to SARPE. There are still no conclusive ways to identify the optimal equilibrium between extensive surgeries for adequate mobilization versus a conservative procedure with minimal complications. Advances in imaging techniques have added another dimension to the evaluation of bone density and surgical manipulation. These can assist in achieving greater precision and help standardize surgical techniques and orthodontic treatment protocols.
There are no conflicts of interest.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Angle EH. Treatment of irregularities of the permanent adult tooth. Dent Cosmos 1860;1:540-5.
Haas AJ. Rapid palatal expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity byopening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 1961;31:73-90.
Moss JP. Rapid expansion of the maxillary arch: Part I. J Pract Orthod 1960;2:165-71.
Moss JP. Rapid expansion of the maxillary arch. II. Indications for rapid expansion. J Pract Orthod 1968;2:215-23.
Lines PA. Adult rapid maxillary expansion with corticotomy. Am J Orthod 1975;67:44-56.
Haas AJ. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 1980;50:189-217.
Timms DJ, Vero D. The relationship of rapid maxillary expansion to surgery with special reference to midpalatal synostosis. Br J Oral Surg 1981;19:180-96.
Jacobs JD, Bell WH, William's OL, Kennedy III JW, Kimbrough OL, James WB et al
. Osteotomyas an adjunct to rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1876;70:123.
Bell WH, Epker BN. Surgical-orthodontic expansion of the maxilla. Am J Orthod 1976;70:517-28.
Bell WH, Jacobs JD. Surgical-orthodontic correction of horizontal maxillary deficiency. J Oral Surg 1979;37:897-902.
Lehman JA Jr., Haas AJ, Haas DG. Surgical-orthodontic correction of transverse maxillary deficiency. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:749-55.
Lehman JA Jr., Haas AJ, Haas DG. Surgical orthodontic correction of transverse maxillary deficiency: A simplified approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:62-8.
Kraut RA. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion by opening the midpalatal suture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:651-5.
Kennedy JW 3rd
, Bell WH, Kimbrough OL, James WB. Osteotomy as an adjunct to rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1976;70:123-37.
Woods M, Wiesenfeld D, Probert T. Surgically-assisted maxillary expansion. Aust Dent J 1997;42:38-42.
Koudstaal MJ, Poort LJ, van der Wal KG, Wolvius EB, Prahl-Andersen B, Schulten AJ, et al.
Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME): A review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:709-14.
Suri L, Taneja P. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:290-302.
Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Color Atlas of Dental Medicine: Orthodontic Diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1993.
Mossaz CF, Byloff FK, Richter M. Unilateral and bilateral corticotomies for correction of maxillary transverse discrepancies. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:110-6.
Carlsen NL, Krasilnikoff PA, Eiken M. Premature cranial synostosis in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets: Possible precipitation by 1-alpha-OH-cholecalciferol intoxication. Acta Paediatr Scand 1984;73:149-54.
Cohen MM Jr. Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet 1993;47:581-616.
Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:65-71.
Müller HP, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa and periodontal phenotype: A review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:172-83.
Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa: A methodologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:248-53.
Cureton SL, Cuenin M. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: Orthodontic preparation for clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:46-59.
Basdra EK, Zöller JE, Komposch G. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:762-6.
Aznar T, Galán AF, Marín I, Domínguez A. Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits. Angle Orthod 2006;76:441-5.
Löfstrand-Tideström B, Thilander B, Ahlqvist-Rastad J, Jakobsson O, Hultcrantz E. Breathing obstruction in relation to craniofacial and dental arch morphology in 4-year-old children. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:323-32.
Nishimura T, Suzuki K. Anatomy of oral respiration: Morphology of the oral cavity and pharynx. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2003;550:25-8.
Bays RA, Greco JM. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: An outpatient technique with long-term stability. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:110-3.
Mew J. Long-term effect of rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:543.
Velázquez P, Benito E, Bravo LA. Rapid maxillary expansion. A study of the long-term effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:361-7.
Carmen M, Marcella P, Giuseppe C, Roberto A. Periodontal evaluation in patients undergoing maxillary expansion. J Craniofac Surg 2000;11:491-4.
Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Pitaru S. Repair process of external root resorption subsequent to palatal expansion treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:120-30.
Oztürk M, Doruk C, Ozeç I, Polat S, Babacan H, Biçakci AA, et al.
Pulpal blood flow: Effects of corticotomy and midline osteotomy in surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003;31:97-100.
Harada K, Sato M, Omura K. Blood-flow change and recovery of sensibility in the maxillary dental pulp during and after maxillary distraction: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:528-32.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]